Supreme Court Rules That LGBT Discrimination is Unlawful in Monumental Decision

June 18, 2020

On Monday the Supreme Court ruled that federal law prevents the discrimination of LGBT employees, an important win for advocates of gay and trans rights — and a surprising decision by a mostly conservative court.

By a vote of 6-3, the court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bans the discrimination of employees based on sex among other factors, applies to gender status and sexual orientation. The ruling was upheld from the lower courts.

Another surprise was the decision written by Donald Trump’s appointee Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s four liberal justices, forming a majority. 

"An employer who fired an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex," Gorsuch wrote, "Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids."

"Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result," he wrote, "But the limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands."

"Only the written word is the law, and all persons are entitled to its benefit," he states.

Across the nation, 21 states have adopted laws preventing discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender. Seven other states adopted this rule, though it only applies to public employees. These states will retain the laws, with Monday’s ruling protecting everyone in the country.

The case is considered a monumental win by gay and trans rights advocates, rivaling even the decision allowing same-sex marriage. They acknowledge that sexual orientation was not considered by anyone in congress when the bill was written. They state that when an employer fires a male for dating a male but doesn’t fire a male for dating a female, that violates the law.

President Donald Trump, speaking at a White House round-table about senior citizen issues, called the decision "very powerful" and said "we live with" it.

"They've ruled and we live with their decision. That's what it's all about, we live with the decision of the Supreme Court," he said.

“The Supreme Court’s clarification that it’s unlawful to fire people because they’re LGBTQ is the result of decades of advocates fighting for our rights," James Esseks, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & HIV Project, said in a statement. "The court has caught up to the majority of our country, which already knows that discriminating against LGBTQ people is both unfair and against the law.”

Sarah Kate Ellis, the president and CEO of GLAAD, declared, "The decision gives us hope that as a country we can unite for the common good and continue the fight for LGBTQ acceptance.”

The decision was celebrated by democratic leaders, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), regarding it as "a victory for the LGBTQ community, for our democracy and for our fundamental values of equality and justice for all."

Former Vice President Joe Biden, presumed to be the Democrat’s presidential nominee, called the ruling "a momentous step forward for our country," adding that the court had "confirmed the simple but profoundly American idea that every human being should be treated with respect and dignity, that everyone should be able to live openly, proudly, as their true selves without fear."

The ruling comes as justice for Gerald Bostock, who was fired from a county position after joining a gay softball team, and the family and friends of Donald Zarta who was fired from a skydiving job after he joked with a female client, telling her not to worry about being strapped to him during a jump because he was gay. Zarda passed away before the case could reach the Supreme Court.

Bostock, in a statement released by the Human Rights Campaign, said, “There are truly no words to describe just how elated I am," adding that he felt "devastated" after being fired from the position he loved seven years ago. He said he felt "sincerely grateful" for the Supreme Court, his attorneys, and the advocacy groups that supported him.

“Today, we can go to work without the fear of being fired for who we are and who we love," Bostock said. "Yet, there is more work to be done. Discrimination has no place in this world, and I will not rest until we have equal rights for all.”

In an interview with Katy Tur on Monday, he said that the ruling gave him "validation" for what he went through, saying that it was not easy. He noted that not only did he lose his only source of income, but his health insurance as well. It came at a time when he was battling prostate cancer.

"In this this time of uncertainty, and certainly some dark days with a civil unrest going on around us, my hope is that this this brings a little bit of sunshine to these dark days, because what it tells me is there is hope," Bostock said. "I had faith in the system and I had faith that the justices would do the right thing. And I think this is just one step in laying the groundwork, though, because it underscores given everything going on in our country today that we still have more work to do."

In separate statements, Pelosi and the Human Rights Campaign called for the Senate to pass legislation that was passed in the House called the Equality Act, which expands the banning of discrimination to education and housing.

The court case included Aimee Stephens, who was fired from her job two weeks after telling the company she was transgender. Her boss told her she was fired because she didn’t follow the dress code.

"He said, this is not going to work," Stephens said. "And he handed me a letter firing me and offering me what I took to be hush money to keep my mouth shut."

Stephens, unfortunately, did not live to see the court case through. She died on May 12 while in a hospice for kidney disease. Her surviving spouse fought the case.

The ACLU stated that her case clearly showed discrimination, for had she been assigned female sex at birth she would not have been fired for dressing as a woman. Instead, Stephens was assigned the male gender at birth and was promptly fired for not conforming to male stereotypes.

The funeral home defended itself, saying that treating men and women equally does not mean they have to treat a man as a woman.

"It is not sex discrimination for an employer to apply a sex-specific dress code or provide sex-specific changing and restroom facilities based on biological sex rather than one's internal sense of gender," the company said to the court, saying that their actions did not show a bias towards one gender.

The Trump administration argued to the court that Title VII does not apply to these cases, which is the exact opposite that the government held during the Obama administration.

"The ordinary meaning of 'sex' is biologically male or female; it does not include sexual orientation," the Justice Department said. "An employer who discriminates against employees in same-sex relationships thus does not violate Title VII as long as it treats men in same-sex relationships the same as women in same-sex relationships."

November 6, 2011
Race Discrimination Suit Filed Against Quinn Emanuel Law Firm

On October 28th, former staff-attorney, Kisshia Simmons-Grant, filed a lawsuit against Quinn Emanuel in New York City alleging race discrimination.  Ms. Simmons-Grant worked for the law firm from November, 2006 to August, 2010, as part of a group of 20-25 staff attorneys.  The group was paid on an hourly basis, and Ms. Simmons-Grant claims that they were […]

Read More
October 25, 2011
New York Wage Theft Protection Act

The New York Wage Theft Prevention Act (the “Act”), in effect April 12, 2011, amends the New York Labor Law to provide greater protections for employees in New York. The Act also imposes tougher penalties for employers who fail to pay their employees overtime or minimum wage. Increased Employee Notice Requirements The current Labor Law in […]

Read More
October 24, 2011
Gender Discrimination lawsuit Filed in New York City Against Proskauer Rose Law Firm

Rosenthal v. Proskauer Rose, 111343-11: Former CFO of Proskauer Rose, Elly Rosenthal, sued the law firm for $10 million for alleged gender discrimination in New York. Ms. Rosenthal claims that after 16 years of excellent performance, the law firm demoted her, denying her pay increases, then wrongfully terminated her employment after she took medical leave for breast cancer treatment. Plaintiff claims […]

Read More
October 15, 2011
I Really need a Job… But do I have to give up my Facebook username and Password to land it?

With the unemployment rate above 9%, millions of Americans are desperately in search of a job. Yet, is it fair for employers to ask applicants for their username and password to social media sites like Facebook? Today, more than 50% of employers rely on social media when recruiting applicants. At first glance, why shouldn’t an […]

Read More
October 15, 2011
So many uphill battles yes, but ... Boy, have women come a long way!

Over the course of a decade, changes in social opinion and the economy led to significant advances in women’s roles in society and in history. Major social changes between 1964 and 1974 allowed women to strive to be more than housewives and homemakers. “This entire sex for the entire history of the world was regarded […]

Read More
March 26, 2020
Family Paid Leave

Governor of New York State, Andrew Cuomo, has guaranteed workers job protection and financial compensation in the event they are subject to an order of mandatory or precautionary quarantine or isolation issued by their local board of health, the Department of Health, or the state of NY. The majority of workers will receive financial compensation […]

Read More
March 26, 2020
FACT SHEET: New York State’s Emergency Paid Sick Leave Legislation

Amid the current coronavirus (COIVID-19) outbreak, the New York Legislature has enacted legislation that gives workers emergency paid leave for coronavirus. To better understand this legislation, and its conditions and requirements, we have shared below a Fact Sheet compiled by A Better Balance on New York State's Emergency Paid Sick Leave Legislation containing all that […]

Read More
March 26, 2020
New York State Passes Emergency Paid Sick Leave Bill Amid Coronavirus

Wednesday, March 11th in Albany, NY, state lawmakers voted in empty chambers on bills following emergency coronavirus (COVID-19) protocols put in place after two lawmakers tested positive for the deadly virus. The New York State Senate and Assembly passed a bill expanding paid sick leave to all public and private sector workers affected by mandatory […]

Read More
March 28, 2020
Labor Dept. Issues Guidance on Paid Leave Law in Regards to Coronavirus

March 25th, 2020 - In order to help workers and employers navigate the leave provisions of the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) relief package, The U.S. Department of Labor has issued guidance that helps many employers pay employees that are unable to work because of coronavirus related issues.  Fact sheets and Q&A documents are being used for […]

Read More
May 1, 2020
Watch Me on the Show Raising The Bar This Sunday!

This Sunday, May 3rd at 9pm EST, I will be featured on Raising The Bar as we discuss Worker's Rights during the current Covid pandemic. Tune in for the latest information about your rights in this troubling time. Here's a brief preview of what to expect.

Read More

Free Initial Consultation

We Hear You. Trust us to take care of you and your case.
Copyright Law Offices of Laurie E. Morrison | All Rights Reserved | Website and SEO Services by: Marketing Powers, LLC
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram